By: Elias Jay Hudson

Department of Political Science and Geography

Abstract

The American public, by and large, remains unaware of the disciplinary processes exercised by the U.S. military, in spite ofho the dramatic rendition of courtroom trials as depicted in blockbuster movies and literature. Non-judicial punishments under Article 15 of the UCMJ remain the predominant vehicle for the discipline of American troops: a process which is hardly transparent or procedural and seemingly permits the sexual assault of civilians and female servicemembers to proliferate. On the other hand, Article 15 is often heralded for its utility in quickly and efficiently settling matters without complicating processes unnecessarily. This report offers a nuanced take on the strengths and drawbacks of non-judicial punishment, including comparative analysis and specific policy recommendations.

Read the full paper below